Hemplat sourcing desk / Phase 1

What can actually reach your plant.

Define the material, receiving point, and documentation requirements. Hemplat ranks indexed potential sources by requirement coverage and freight exposure—without inventing unpublished supplier data.

Sourcing answer

Hemp hurd to Detroit, MI 48201

1,500tons / year
Road distanceEstimated freight / ton
Freight-intensive zone
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 mi 1,526 mi
Freight rises with distance

Mill prices are not published, so the 35% freight-share threshold cannot be claimed for these suppliers. The shaded area indicates increasing freight exposure, not a carrier quote.

11 indexed sources with explicit material outputRanked by documentation fit, then estimated freight
01

Fiber / bedding supplier

American Hemp LLC

Not published, North Carolina, United States

Explicit supplier outputNot documented: Moisture ≤ 12%Not documented: Third-party documentation per lotNot documented: Graded to published specification
Road distance
593 mi
Payload assumption
10 t
Mill price
Not published
Est. freight
$190/t
Estimated landed costQuote + $190/t freight
02

Fiber processor / decortication

BIOPHIL Natural Fibers

Lumberton, North Carolina, United States

Explicit supplier outputNot documented: Moisture ≤ 12%Not documented: Third-party documentation per lotNot documented: Graded to published specification
Road distance
681 mi
Payload assumption
10 t
Mill price
Not published
Est. freight
$218/t
Estimated landed costQuote + $218/t freight
03

Fiber processor

BastCore

Montgomery, Alabama, United States

Explicit supplier outputNot documented: Moisture ≤ 12%Not documented: Third-party documentation per lotNot documented: Graded to published specification
Road distance
840 mi
Payload assumption
10 t
Mill price
Not published
Est. freight
$269/t
Estimated landed costQuote + $269/t freight
04

Fiber processor

Dakota Hemp

Wakonda, South Dakota, United States

Explicit supplier outputNot documented: Moisture ≤ 12%Not documented: Third-party documentation per lotNot documented: Graded to published specification
Road distance
843 mi
Payload assumption
10 t
Mill price
Not published
Est. freight
$270/t
Estimated landed costQuote + $270/t freight
05

Fiber processor

Complete Hemp Processing

Winfred, South Dakota, United States

Explicit supplier outputNot documented: Moisture ≤ 12%Not documented: Third-party documentation per lotNot documented: Graded to published specification
Road distance
860 mi
Payload assumption
10 t
Mill price
Not published
Est. freight
$275/t
Estimated landed costQuote + $275/t freight
06

Fiber processor

Panda Biotech

Wichita Falls, Texas, United States

Explicit supplier outputNot documented: Moisture ≤ 12%Not documented: Third-party documentation per lotNot documented: Graded to published specification
Road distance
1,202 mi
Payload assumption
10 t
Mill price
Not published
Est. freight
$385/t
Estimated landed costQuote + $385/t freight
07

Grower / animal bedding processor

Wyoming Hemp Company

Not published, Wyoming, United States

Explicit supplier outputNot documented: Moisture ≤ 12%Not documented: Third-party documentation per lotNot documented: Graded to published specification
Road distance
1,448 mi
Payload assumption
10 t
Mill price
Not published
Est. freight
$463/t
Estimated landed costQuote + $463/t freight
08

Fiber processor + equipment

Global Fiber Processing

Silt, Colorado, United States

Explicit supplier outputNot documented: Moisture ≤ 12%Not documented: Third-party documentation per lotNot documented: Graded to published specification
Road distance
1,526 mi
Payload assumption
10 t
Mill price
Not published
Est. freight
$488/t
Estimated landed costQuote + $488/t freight
09

Agricultural processor

IND HEMP

Fort Benton, Montana, United States

Explicit supplier outputNot documented: Moisture ≤ 12%Not documented: Third-party documentation per lotNot documented: Graded to published specification
Road distance
1,641 mi
Payload assumption
10 t
Mill price
Not published
Est. freight
$525/t
Estimated landed costQuote + $525/t freight
10

Material supplier

Hemp Traders

Los Angeles, California, United States

Imported lot · China

Explicit supplier outputNot documented: Moisture ≤ 12%Not documented: Third-party documentation per lotNot documented: Graded to published specification
Road distance
2,312 mi
Payload assumption
10 t
Mill price
Not published
Est. freight
$740/t
Estimated landed costQuote + $740/t freight
11

Building materials

HempFlax Building Solutions USA

Los Angeles, California, United States

Imported lot · European supply; lot-specific origin required

Explicit supplier outputNot documented: Moisture ≤ 12%Not documented: Third-party documentation per lotNot documented: Graded to published specification
Road distance
2,335 mi
Payload assumption
10 t
Mill price
Not published
Est. freight
$747/t
Estimated landed costQuote + $747/t freight

Market context / Not suppliers

Also indexed near you — buyers and converters of this material.

Freight calculation methodology
road miles = haversine distance × 1.18loaded-mile freight / ton = road miles × $/mile ÷ payload tonsdeadhead scenario = loaded-mile freight × 2

The default assumes a backhaul is available. Enable deadhead only for lanes where the truck is likely to return empty. Rates and payloads are planning assumptions, not routing results or carrier quotes.

Buyer intake QC

Prepare a private lot-test submission.

No lot-test data is stored or published in this MVP. Buyer identity will be excluded from any future public aggregation.

Do not include personal data in lot references. Buyer identity is held privately and never displayed publicly.